# Contributing

Appendix Contributing
ISO C++ library

The GNU C++ Library is part of GCC and follows the same development model, so the general rules for contributing to GCC apply. Active contributors are assigned maintainership responsibility, and given write access to the source repository. First-time contributors should follow this procedure:

## Contributor Checklist

### Reading

- Get and read the relevant sections of the C++ language specification. Copies of the full ISO 14882 standard are available on line via the ISO mirror site for committee members. Non-members, or those who have not paid for the privilege of sitting on the committee and sustained their two meeting commitment for voting rights, may get a copy of the standard from their respective national standards organization. In the USA, this national standards organization is ANSI. (And if you've already registered with them you can buy the standard on-line.)

- The library working group bugs, and known defects, can be obtained here: https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21

- Peruse the GNU Coding Standards, and chuckle when you hit the part about Using Languages Other Than C.

- Be familiar with the extensions that preceded these general GNU rules. These style issues for libstdc++ can be found in Coding Style.

- And last but certainly not least, read the library-specific information found in Porting and Maintenance.

### Assignment

See the legal prerequisites for all GCC contributions.

Historically, the libstdc++ assignment form added the following question:

Which Belgian comic book character is better, Tintin or Asterix, and why?

While not strictly necessary, humoring the maintainers and answering this question would be appreciated.

Please contact Paolo Carlini at paolo.carlini@oracle.com or Jonathan Wakely at jwakely+assign@redhat.com if you are confused about the assignment or have general licensing questions. When requesting an assignment form from assign@gnu.org, please CC the libstdc++ maintainers above so that progress can be monitored.

### Getting Sources

Getting write access (look for "Write after approval")

### Submitting Patches

Every patch must have several pieces of information before it can be properly evaluated. Ideally (and to ensure the fastest possible response from the maintainers) it would have all of these pieces:

- A description of the bug and how your patch fixes this bug. For new features a description of the feature and your implementation.

- A ChangeLog entry as part of the Git commit message. Check some recent commits for format and content. The `contrib/mklog.py` script can be used to generate a ChangeLog template for commit messages. See Read-write Git access for scripts and aliases that are useful here.

- A testsuite submission or sample program that will easily and simply show the existing error or test new functionality.

- The patch itself. If you are using the Git repository use `git show` or `git format-patch` to produce a patch; otherwise, use `diff -cp OLD NEW`. If your version of diff does not support these options, then get the latest version of GNU diff.

- When you have all these pieces, bundle them up in a mail message and send it to libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org. All patches and related discussion should be sent to the libstdc++ mailing list. In common with the rest of GCC, patches should also be sent to the gcc-patches mailing list. So you could send your email To:libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org and Cc:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org for example.

## Directory Layout and Source Conventions

The `libstdc++-v3` directory in the GCC sources contains the files needed to create the GNU C++ Library.

It has subdirectories:

`doc`
  Files in HTML and text format that document usage, quirks of the implementation, and contributor checklists.
`include`
  All header files for the C++ library are within this directory, modulo specific runtime-related files that are in the libsupc++ directory.
  `include/std`
    Files meant to be found by `#include <name>` directives in standard-conforming user programs.
  `include/c`
    Headers intended to directly include standard C headers. [NB: this can be enabled via `--enable-cheaders=c`]
  `include/c_global`
    Headers intended to include standard C headers in the global namespace, and put select names into the `std::` namespace. [NB: this is the default, and is the same as `--enable-cheaders=c_global`]
  `include/c_std`
    Headers intended to include standard C headers already in namespace std, and put select names into the `std::` namespace. [NB: this is the same as `--enable-cheaders=c_std`]
  `include/bits`
    Files included by standard headers and by other files in the bits directory.
  `include/backward`
    Headers provided for backward compatibility, such as `<backward/hash_map>`. They are not used in this library.
  `include/ext`
    Headers that define extensions to the standard library. No standard header refers to any of them, in theory (there are some exceptions).
  `include/debug`, `include/parallel`, and
    Headers that implement the Debug Mode and Parallel Mode extensions.
`scripts`
  Scripts that are used during the configure, build, make, or test process.
`src`
  Files that are used in constructing the library, but are not installed.
  `src/c++98`
    Source files compiled using `-std=gnu++98`.
  `src/c++11`
    Source files compiled using `-std=gnu++11`.
  `src/filesystem`
    Source files for the Filesystem TS.
  `src/shared`
    Source code included by other files under both `src/c++98` and `src/c++11`
`testsuites/[backward, demangle, ext, performance, thread, 17_* to 30_*]`
  Test programs are here, and may be used to begin to exercise the library. Support for "make check" and "make check-install" is complete, and runs through all the subdirectories here when this command is issued from the build directory. Please note that "make check" requires DejaGnu 1.4 or later to be installed, or for extra permutations DejaGnu 1.5.3 or later.

Other subdirectories contain variant versions of certain files that are meant to be copied or linked by the configure script. Currently these are:

    config/abi
    config/allocator
    config/cpu
    config/io
    config/locale
    config/os

In addition, a subdirectory holds the convenience library libsupc++.

`libsupc++`
  Contains the runtime library for C++, including exception handling and memory allocation and deallocation, RTTI, terminate handlers, etc.

Note that glibc also has a `bits/` subdirectory. We need to be careful not to collide with names in its `bits/` directory. For example `<bits/std_mutex.h>` has to be renamed from `<bits/mutex.h>`. Another solution would be to rename `bits` to (e.g.) `cppbits`.

In files throughout the system, lines marked with an "XXX" indicate a bug or incompletely-implemented feature. Lines marked "XXX MT" indicate a place that may require attention for multi-thread safety.

## Coding Style

### Bad Identifiers

Identifiers that conflict and should be avoided.

          This is the list of names reserved to the
          implementation that have been claimed by certain
          compilers and system headers of interest, and should not be used
          in the library. It will grow, of course.  We generally are
          interested in names that are not all-caps, except for those like
          "_T"

          For Solaris:
          _B
          _C
          _L
          _N
          _P
          _S
          _U
          _X
          _E1
          ..
          _E24

          Irix adds:
          _A
          _G

          MS adds:
          _T
          __deref

          BSD adds:
          __used
          __unused
          __inline
          _Complex
          __istype
          __maskrune
          __tolower
          __toupper
          __wchar_t
          __wint_t
          _res
          _res_ext
          __tg_*

          VxWorks adds:
          _C2

          For GCC:

          [Note that this list is out of date. It applies to the old
          name-mangling; in G++ 3.0 and higher a different name-mangling is
          used. In addition, many of the bugs relating to G++ interpreting
          these names as operators have been fixed.]

          The full set of __* identifiers (combined from gcc/cp/lex.c and
          gcc/cplus-dem.c) that are either old or new, but are definitely
          recognized by the demangler, is:

          __aa
          __aad
          __ad
          __addr
          __adv
          __aer
          __als
          __alshift
          __amd
          __ami
          __aml
          __amu
          __aor
          __apl
          __array
          __ars
          __arshift
          __as
          __bit_and
          __bit_ior
          __bit_not
          __bit_xor
          __call
          __cl
          __cm
          __cn
          __co
          __component
          __compound
          __cond
          __convert
          __delete
          __dl
          __dv
          __eq
          __er
          __ge
          __gt
          __indirect
          __le
          __ls
          __lt
          __max
          __md
          __method_call
          __mi
          __min
          __minus
          __ml
          __mm
          __mn
          __mult
          __mx
          __ne
          __negate
          __new
          __nop
          __nt
          __nw
          __oo
          __op
          __or
          __pl
          __plus
          __postdecrement
          __postincrement
          __pp
          __pt
          __rf
          __rm
          __rs
          __sz
          __trunc_div
          __trunc_mod
          __truth_andif
          __truth_not
          __truth_orif
          __vc
          __vd
          __vn

          SGI badnames:
          __builtin_alloca
          __builtin_fsqrt
          __builtin_sqrt
          __builtin_fabs
          __builtin_dabs
          __builtin_cast_f2i
          __builtin_cast_i2f
          __builtin_cast_d2ll
          __builtin_cast_ll2d
          __builtin_copy_dhi2i
          __builtin_copy_i2dhi
          __builtin_copy_dlo2i
          __builtin_copy_i2dlo
          __add_and_fetch
          __sub_and_fetch
          __or_and_fetch
          __xor_and_fetch
          __and_and_fetch
          __nand_and_fetch
          __mpy_and_fetch
          __min_and_fetch
          __max_and_fetch
          __fetch_and_add
          __fetch_and_sub
          __fetch_and_or
          __fetch_and_xor
          __fetch_and_and
          __fetch_and_nand
          __fetch_and_mpy
          __fetch_and_min
          __fetch_and_max
          __lock_test_and_set
          __lock_release
          __lock_acquire
          __compare_and_swap
          __synchronize
          __high_multiply
          __unix
          __sgi
          __linux__
          __i386__
          __i486__
          __cplusplus
          __embedded_cplusplus
          // long double conversion members mangled as __opr
          // http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/1999-q4/msg00060.html
          __opr

### By Example

          This library is written to appropriate C++ coding standards. As such,
          it is intended to precede the recommendations of the GNU Coding
          Standard, which can be referenced in full here:

          https://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/standards.html#Formatting

          The rest of this is also interesting reading, but skip the "Design
          Advice" part.

          The GCC coding conventions are here, and are also useful:
          https://gcc.gnu.org/codingconventions.html

          In addition, because it doesn't seem to be stated explicitly anywhere
          else, there is an 80 column source limit.

          ChangeLog entries for member functions should use the
          classname::member function name syntax as follows:

    1999-04-15  Dennis Ritchie  <dr@att.com>

          * src/basic_file.cc (__basic_file::open): Fix thinko in
          _G_HAVE_IO_FILE_OPEN bits.

          Notable areas of divergence from what may be previous local practice
          (particularly for GNU C) include:

          01. Pointers and references

            char* p = "flop";
            char& c = *p;
              -NOT-
            char *p = "flop";  // wrong
            char &c = *p;      // wrong

          Reason: In C++, definitions are mixed with executable code. Here,
          p is being initialized, not *p.  This is near-universal
          practice among C++ programmers; it is normal for C hackers
          to switch spontaneously as they gain experience.

          02. Operator names and parentheses

            operator==(type)
              -NOT-
            operator == (type)  // wrong

          Reason: The == is part of the function name. Separating
          it makes the declaration look like an expression.

          03. Function names and parentheses

            void mangle()
              -NOT-
            void mangle ()  // wrong

          Reason: no space before parentheses (except after a control-flow
          keyword) is near-universal practice for C++. It identifies the
          parentheses as the function-call operator or declarator, as
          opposed to an expression or other overloaded use of parentheses.

          04. Template function indentation

            template<typename T>
              void
              template_function(args)
              { }
              -NOT-
            template<class T>
            void template_function(args) {};

          Reason: In class definitions, without indentation whitespace is
          needed both above and below the declaration to distinguish
          it visually from other members. (Also, re: "typename"
          rather than "class".)  T often could be int, which is
          not a class. ("class", here, is an anachronism.)

          05. Template class indentation

            template<typename _CharT, typename _Traits>
              class basic_ios : public ios_base
              {
              public:
                // Types:
              };
              -NOT-
            template<class _CharT, class _Traits>
            class basic_ios : public ios_base
              {
              public:
                // Types:
              };
              -NOT-
            template<class _CharT, class _Traits>
              class basic_ios : public ios_base
            {
              public:
                // Types:
            };

          06. Enumerators

            enum
            {
              space = _ISspace,
              print = _ISprint,
              cntrl = _IScntrl
            };
              -NOT-
            enum { space = _ISspace, print = _ISprint, cntrl = _IScntrl };

          07. Member initialization lists
          All one line, separate from class name.

            gribble::gribble()
            : _M_private_data(0), _M_more_stuff(0), _M_helper(0)
            { }
              -NOT-
            gribble::gribble() : _M_private_data(0), _M_more_stuff(0), _M_helper(0)
            { }

          08. Try/Catch blocks

            try
              {
                //
              }
            catch (...)
              {
                //
              }
              -NOT-
            try {
              //
            } catch(...) {
              //
            }

          09. Member functions declarations and definitions
          Keywords such as extern, static, export, explicit, inline, etc
          go on the line above the function name. Thus

          virtual int
          foo()
          -NOT-
          virtual int foo()

          Reason: GNU coding conventions dictate return types for functions
          are on a separate line than the function name and parameter list
          for definitions. For C++, where we have member functions that can
          be either inline definitions or declarations, keeping to this
          standard allows all member function names for a given class to be
          aligned to the same margin, increasing readability.

          10. Invocation of member functions with "this->"
          For non-uglified names, use this->name to call the function.

          this->sync()
          -NOT-
          sync()

          Reason: Koenig lookup.

          11. Namespaces

          namespace std
          {
            blah blah blah;
          } // namespace std

          -NOT-

          namespace std {
            blah blah blah;
          } // namespace std

          12. Spacing under protected and private in class declarations:
          space above, none below
          i.e.

          public:
            int foo;

          -NOT-
          public:

            int foo;

          13. Spacing WRT return statements.
          no extra spacing before returns, no parenthesis
          i.e.

          }
          return __ret;

          -NOT-
          }

          return __ret;

          -NOT-

          }
          return (__ret);

          14. Location of global variables.
          All global variables of class type, whether in the "user visible"
          space (e.g., cin) or the implementation namespace, must be defined
          as a character array with the appropriate alignment and then later
          re-initialized to the correct value.

          This is due to startup issues on certain platforms, such as AIX.
          For more explanation and examples, see src/globals.cc. All such
          variables should be contained in that file, for simplicity.

          15. Exception abstractions
          Use the exception abstractions found in functexcept.h, which allow
          C++ programmers to use this library with -fno-exceptions.  (Even if
          that is rarely advisable, it's a necessary evil for backwards
          compatibility.)

          16. Exception error messages
          All start with the name of the function where the exception is
          thrown, and then (optional) descriptive text is added. Example:

          __throw_logic_error(__N("basic_string::_S_construct NULL not valid"));

          Reason: The verbose terminate handler prints out exception::what(),
          as well as the typeinfo for the thrown exception. As this is the
          default terminate handler, by putting location info into the
          exception string, a very useful error message is printed out for
          uncaught exceptions. So useful, in fact, that non-programmers can
          give useful error messages, and programmers can intelligently
          speculate what went wrong without even using a debugger.

          17. The doxygen style guide to comments is a separate document,
          see index.

          The library currently has a mixture of GNU-C and modern C++ coding
          styles. The GNU C usages will be combed out gradually.

          Name patterns:

          For nonstandard names appearing in Standard headers, we are constrained
          to use names that begin with underscores. This is called "uglification".
          The convention is:

          Local and argument names:  __[a-z].*

          Examples:  __count  __ix  __s1

          Type names and template formal-argument names: _[A-Z][^_].*

          Examples:  _Helper  _CharT  _Nm

          Member data and function names: _M_.*

          Examples:  _M_num_elements  _M_initialize ()

          Static data members, constants, and enumerations: _S_.*

          Examples: _S_max_elements  _S_default_value

          Don't use names in the same scope that differ only in the prefix,
          e.g. _S_top and _M_top. See BADNAMES for a list of forbidden names.
          (The most tempting of these seem to be and "_T" and "_N".)

          Names must never have "__" internally; it would confuse name
          unmanglers on some targets. Also, never use "__[0-9]", same reason.

          --------------------------

          [BY EXAMPLE]

          #ifndef  _HEADER_
          #define  _HEADER_ 1

          namespace std
          {
            class gribble
            {
            public:
              gribble() throw();

              gribble(const gribble&);

              explicit
              gribble(int __howmany);

              gribble&
              operator=(const gribble&);

              virtual
              ~gribble() throw ();

              // Start with a capital letter, end with a period.
              inline void
              public_member(const char* __arg) const;

              // In-class function definitions should be restricted to one-liners.
              int
              one_line() { return 0 }

              int
              two_lines(const char* arg)
              { return strchr(arg, 'a'); }

              inline int
              three_lines();  // inline, but defined below.

              // Note indentation.
              template<typename _Formal_argument>
                void
                public_template() const throw();

              template<typename _Iterator>
                void
                other_template();

            private:
              class _Helper;

              int _M_private_data;
              int _M_more_stuff;
              _Helper* _M_helper;
              int _M_private_function();

              enum _Enum
                {
                  _S_one,
                  _S_two
                };

              static void
              _S_initialize_library();
            };

            // More-or-less-standard language features described by lack, not presence.
          # ifndef _G_NO_LONGLONG
            extern long long _G_global_with_a_good_long_name;  // avoid globals!
          # endif

            // Avoid in-class inline definitions, define separately;
            // likewise for member class definitions:
            inline int
            gribble::public_member() const
            { int __local = 0; return __local; }

            class gribble::_Helper
            {
              int _M_stuff;

              friend class gribble;
            };
          }

          // Names beginning with "__": only for arguments and
          //   local variables; never use "__" in a type name, or
          //   within any name; never use "__[0-9]".

          #endif /* _HEADER_ */

          namespace std
          {
            template<typename T>  // notice: "typename", not "class", no space
              long_return_value_type<with_many, args>
              function_name(char* pointer,               // "char *pointer" is wrong.
                            char* argument,
                            const Reference& ref)
              {
                // int a_local;  /* wrong; see below. */
                if (test)
                {
                  nested code
                }

                int a_local = 0;  // declare variable at first use.

                //  char a, b, *p;   /* wrong */
                char a = 'a';
                char b = a + 1;
                char* c = "abc";  // each variable goes on its own line, always.

                // except maybe here...
                for (unsigned i = 0, mask = 1; mask; ++i, mask <<= 1) {
                  // ...
                }
              }

            gribble::gribble()
            : _M_private_data(0), _M_more_stuff(0), _M_helper(0)
            { }

            int
            gribble::three_lines()
            {
              // doesn't fit in one line.
            }
          } // namespace std

## Design Notes

        The Library
        -----------

        This paper is covers two major areas:

        - Features and policies not mentioned in the standard that
        the quality of the library implementation depends on, including
        extensions and "implementation-defined" features;

        - Plans for required but unimplemented library features and
        optimizations to them.

        Overhead
        --------

        The standard defines a large library, much larger than the standard
        C library. A naive implementation would suffer substantial overhead
        in compile time, executable size, and speed, rendering it unusable
        in many (particularly embedded) applications. The alternative demands
        care in construction, and some compiler support, but there is no
        need for library subsets.

        What are the sources of this overhead?  There are four main causes:

        - The library is specified almost entirely as templates, which
        with current compilers must be included in-line, resulting in
        very slow builds as tens or hundreds of thousands of lines
        of function definitions are read for each user source file.
        Indeed, the entire SGI STL, as well as the dos Reis valarray,
        are provided purely as header files, largely for simplicity in
        porting. Iostream/locale is (or will be) as large again.

        - The library is very flexible, specifying a multitude of hooks
        where users can insert their own code in place of defaults.
        When these hooks are not used, any time and code expended to
        support that flexibility is wasted.

        - Templates are often described as causing to "code bloat". In
        practice, this refers (when it refers to anything real) to several
        independent processes. First, when a class template is manually
        instantiated in its entirely, current compilers place the definitions
        for all members in a single object file, so that a program linking
        to one member gets definitions of all. Second, template functions
        which do not actually depend on the template argument are, under
        current compilers, generated anew for each instantiation, rather
        than being shared with other instantiations. Third, some of the
        flexibility mentioned above comes from virtual functions (both in
        regular classes and template classes) which current linkers add
        to the executable file even when they manifestly cannot be called.

        - The library is specified to use a language feature, exceptions,
        which in the current gcc compiler ABI imposes a run time and
        code space cost to handle the possibility of exceptions even when
        they are not used. Under the new ABI (accessed with -fnew-abi),
        there is a space overhead and a small reduction in code efficiency
        resulting from lost optimization opportunities associated with
        non-local branches associated with exceptions.

        What can be done to eliminate this overhead?  A variety of coding
        techniques, and compiler, linker and library improvements and
        extensions may be used, as covered below. Most are not difficult,
        and some are already implemented in varying degrees.

        Overhead: Compilation Time
        --------------------------

        Providing "ready-instantiated" template code in object code archives
        allows us to avoid generating and optimizing template instantiations
        in each compilation unit which uses them. However, the number of such
        instantiations that are useful to provide is limited, and anyway this
        is not enough, by itself, to minimize compilation time. In particular,
        it does not reduce time spent parsing conforming headers.

        Quicker header parsing will depend on library extensions and compiler
        improvements.  One approach is some variation on the techniques
        previously marketed as "pre-compiled headers", now standardized as
        support for the "export" keyword. "Exported" template definitions
        can be placed (once) in a "repository" -- really just a library, but
        of template definitions rather than object code -- to be drawn upon
        at link time when an instantiation is needed, rather than placed in
        header files to be parsed along with every compilation unit.

        Until "export" is implemented we can put some of the lengthy template
        definitions in #if guards or alternative headers so that users can skip
        over the full definitions when they need only the ready-instantiated
        specializations.

        To be precise, this means that certain headers which define
        templates which users normally use only for certain arguments
        can be instrumented to avoid exposing the template definitions
        to the compiler unless a macro is defined. For example, in
        <string>, we might have:

        template <class _CharT, ... > class basic_string {
        ... // member declarations
        };
        ... // operator declarations

        #ifdef _STRICT_ISO_
        # if _G_NO_TEMPLATE_EXPORT
        #   include <bits/std_locale.h>  // headers needed by definitions
        #   ...
        #   include <bits/string.tcc>  // member and global template definitions.
        # endif
        #endif

        Users who compile without specifying a strict-ISO-conforming flag
        would not see many of the template definitions they now see, and rely
        instead on ready-instantiated specializations in the library. This
        technique would be useful for the following substantial components:
        string, locale/iostreams, valarray. It would *not* be useful or
        usable with the following: containers, algorithms, iterators,
        allocator. Since these constitute a large (though decreasing)
        fraction of the library, the benefit the technique offers is
        limited.

        The language specifies the semantics of the "export" keyword, but
        the gcc compiler does not yet support it. When it does, problems
        with large template inclusions can largely disappear, given some
        minor library reorganization, along with the need for the apparatus
        described above.

        Overhead: Flexibility Cost
        --------------------------

        The library offers many places where users can specify operations
        to be performed by the library in place of defaults. Sometimes
        this seems to require that the library use a more-roundabout, and
        possibly slower, way to accomplish the default requirements than
        would be used otherwise.

        The primary protection against this overhead is thorough compiler
        optimization, to crush out layers of inline function interfaces.
        Kuck & Associates has demonstrated the practicality of this kind
        of optimization.

        The second line of defense against this overhead is explicit
        specialization. By defining helper function templates, and writing
        specialized code for the default case, overhead can be eliminated
        for that case without sacrificing flexibility. This takes full
        advantage of any ability of the optimizer to crush out degenerate
        code.

        The library specifies many virtual functions which current linkers
        load even when they cannot be called. Some minor improvements to the
        compiler and to ld would eliminate any such overhead by simply
        omitting virtual functions that the complete program does not call.
        A prototype of this work has already been done. For targets where
        GNU ld is not used, a "pre-linker" could do the same job.

        The main areas in the standard interface where user flexibility
        can result in overhead are:

        - Allocators:  Containers are specified to use user-definable
        allocator types and objects, making tuning for the container
        characteristics tricky.

        - Locales: the standard specifies locale objects used to implement
        iostream operations, involving many virtual functions which use
        streambuf iterators.

        - Algorithms and containers: these may be instantiated on any type,
        frequently duplicating code for identical operations.

        - Iostreams and strings: users are permitted to use these on their
        own types, and specify the operations the stream must use on these
        types.

        Note that these sources of overhead are _avoidable_. The techniques
        to avoid them are covered below.

        Code Bloat
        ----------

        In the SGI STL, and in some other headers, many of the templates
        are defined "inline" -- either explicitly or by their placement
        in class definitions -- which should not be inline. This is a
        source of code bloat. Matt had remarked that he was relying on
        the compiler to recognize what was too big to benefit from inlining,
        and generate it out-of-line automatically. However, this also can
        result in code bloat except where the linker can eliminate the extra
        copies.

        Fixing these cases will require an audit of all inline functions
        defined in the library to determine which merit inlining, and moving
        the rest out of line. This is an issue mainly in clauses 23, 25, and
        27. Of course it can be done incrementally, and we should generally
        accept patches that move large functions out of line and into ".tcc"
        files, which can later be pulled into a repository. Compiler/linker
        improvements to recognize very large inline functions and move them
        out-of-line, but shared among compilation units, could make this
        work unnecessary.

        Pre-instantiating template specializations currently produces large
        amounts of dead code which bloats statically linked programs. The
        current state of the static library, libstdc++.a, is intolerable on
        this account, and will fuel further confused speculation about a need
        for a library "subset". A compiler improvement that treats each
        instantiated function as a separate object file, for linking purposes,
        would be one solution to this problem. An alternative would be to
        split up the manual instantiation files into dozens upon dozens of
        little files, each compiled separately, but an abortive attempt at
        this was done for <string> and, though it is far from complete, it
        is already a nuisance. A better interim solution (just until we have
        "export") is badly needed.

        When building a shared library, the current compiler/linker cannot
        automatically generate the instantiations needed. This creates a
        miserable situation; it means any time something is changed in the
        library, before a shared library can be built someone must manually
        copy the declarations of all templates that are needed by other parts
        of the library to an "instantiation" file, and add it to the build
        system to be compiled and linked to the library. This process is
        readily automated, and should be automated as soon as possible.
        Users building their own shared libraries experience identical
        frustrations.

        Sharing common aspects of template definitions among instantiations
        can radically reduce code bloat. The compiler could help a great
        deal here by recognizing when a function depends on nothing about
        a template parameter, or only on its size, and giving the resulting
        function a link-name "equate" that allows it to be shared with other
        instantiations. Implementation code could take advantage of the
        capability by factoring out code that does not depend on the template
        argument into separate functions to be merged by the compiler.

        Until such a compiler optimization is implemented, much can be done
        manually (if tediously) in this direction. One such optimization is
        to derive class templates from non-template classes, and move as much
        implementation as possible into the base class. Another is to partial-
        specialize certain common instantiations, such as vector<T*>, to share
        code for instantiations on all types T. While these techniques work,
        they are far from the complete solution that a compiler improvement
        would afford.

        Overhead: Expensive Language Features
        -------------------------------------

        The main "expensive" language feature used in the standard library
        is exception support, which requires compiling in cleanup code with
        static table data to locate it, and linking in library code to use
        the table. For small embedded programs the amount of such library
        code and table data is assumed by some to be excessive. Under the
        "new" ABI this perception is generally exaggerated, although in some
        cases it may actually be excessive.

        To implement a library which does not use exceptions directly is
        not difficult given minor compiler support (to "turn off" exceptions
        and ignore exception constructs), and results in no great library
        maintenance difficulties. To be precise, given "-fno-exceptions",
        the compiler should treat "try" blocks as ordinary blocks, and
        "catch" blocks as dead code to ignore or eliminate. Compiler
        support is not strictly necessary, except in the case of "function
        try blocks"; otherwise the following macros almost suffice:

        #define throw(X)
        #define try      if (true)
        #define catch(X) else if (false)

        However, there may be a need to use function try blocks in the
        library implementation, and use of macros in this way can make
        correct diagnostics impossible. Furthermore, use of this scheme
        would require the library to call a function to re-throw exceptions
        from a try block. Implementing the above semantics in the compiler
        is preferable.

        Given the support above (however implemented) it only remains to
        replace code that "throws" with a call to a well-documented "handler"
        function in a separate compilation unit which may be replaced by
        the user. The main source of exceptions that would be difficult
        for users to avoid is memory allocation failures, but users can
        define their own memory allocation primitives that never throw.
        Otherwise, the complete list of such handlers, and which library
        functions may call them, would be needed for users to be able to
        implement the necessary substitutes. (Fortunately, they have the
        source code.)

        Opportunities
        -------------

        The template capabilities of C++ offer enormous opportunities for
        optimizing common library operations, well beyond what would be
        considered "eliminating overhead". In particular, many operations
        done in Glibc with macros that depend on proprietary language
        extensions can be implemented in pristine Standard C++. For example,
        the chapter 25 algorithms, and even C library functions such as strchr,
        can be specialized for the case of static arrays of known (small) size.

        Detailed optimization opportunities are identified below where
        the component where they would appear is discussed. Of course new
        opportunities will be identified during implementation.

        Unimplemented Required Library Features
        ---------------------------------------

        The standard specifies hundreds of components, grouped broadly by
        chapter. These are listed in excruciating detail in the CHECKLIST
        file.

        17 general
        18 support
        19 diagnostics
        20 utilities
        21 string
        22 locale
        23 containers
        24 iterators
        25 algorithms
        26 numerics
        27 iostreams
        Annex D  backward compatibility

        Anyone participating in implementation of the library should obtain
        a copy of the standard, ISO 14882.  People in the U.S. can obtain an
        electronic copy for US$18 from ANSI's web site. Those from other
        countries should visit http://www.iso.org/ to find out the location
        of their country's representation in ISO, in order to know who can
        sell them a copy.

        The emphasis in the following sections is on unimplemented features
        and optimization opportunities.

        Chapter 17  General
        -------------------

        Chapter 17 concerns overall library requirements.

        The standard doesn't mention threads. A multi-thread (MT) extension
        primarily affects operators new and delete (18), allocator (20),
        string (21), locale (22), and iostreams (27). The common underlying
        support needed for this is discussed under chapter 20.

        The standard requirements on names from the C headers create a
        lot of work, mostly done. Names in the C headers must be visible
        in the std:: and sometimes the global namespace; the names in the
        two scopes must refer to the same object. More stringent is that
        Koenig lookup implies that any types specified as defined in std::
        really are defined in std::. Names optionally implemented as
        macros in C cannot be macros in C++. (An overview may be read at
        <http://www.cantrip.org/cheaders.html>). The scripts "inclosure"
        and "mkcshadow", and the directories shadow/ and cshadow/, are the
        beginning of an effort to conform in this area.

        A correct conforming definition of C header names based on underlying
        C library headers, and practical linking of conforming namespaced
        customer code with third-party C libraries depends ultimately on
        an ABI change, allowing namespaced C type names to be mangled into
        type names as if they were global, somewhat as C function names in a
        namespace, or C++ global variable names, are left unmangled. Perhaps
        another "extern" mode, such as 'extern "C-global"' would be an
        appropriate place for such type definitions. Such a type would
        affect mangling as follows:

        namespace A {
        struct X {};
        extern "C-global" {  // or maybe just 'extern "C"'
        struct Y {};
        };
        }
        void f(A::X*);  // mangles to f__FPQ21A1X
        void f(A::Y*);  // mangles to f__FP1Y

        (It may be that this is really the appropriate semantics for regular
        'extern "C"', and 'extern "C-global"', as an extension, would not be
        necessary.) This would allow functions declared in non-standard C headers
        (and thus fixable by neither us nor users) to link properly with functions
        declared using C types defined in properly-namespaced headers. The
        problem this solves is that C headers (which C++ programmers do persist
        in using) frequently forward-declare C struct tags without including
        the header where the type is defined, as in

        struct tm;
        void munge(tm*);

        Without some compiler accommodation, munge cannot be called by correct
        C++ code using a pointer to a correctly-scoped tm* value.

        The current C headers use the preprocessor extension "#include_next",
        which the compiler complains about when run "-pedantic".
        (Incidentally, it appears that "-fpedantic" is currently ignored,
        probably a bug.)  The solution in the C compiler is to use
        "-isystem" rather than "-I", but unfortunately in g++ this seems
        also to wrap the whole header in an 'extern "C"' block, so it's
        unusable for C++ headers. The correct solution appears to be to
        allow the various special include-directory options, if not given
        an argument, to affect subsequent include-directory options additively,
        so that if one said

        -pedantic -iprefix $(prefix) \
        -idirafter -ino-pedantic -ino-extern-c -iwithprefix -I g++-v3 \
        -iwithprefix -I g++-v3/ext

        the compiler would search $(prefix)/g++-v3 and not report
        pedantic warnings for files found there, but treat files in
        $(prefix)/g++-v3/ext pedantically. (The undocumented semantics
        of "-isystem" in g++ stink. Can they be rescinded?  If not it
        must be replaced with something more rationally behaved.)

        All the C headers need the treatment above; in the standard these
        headers are mentioned in various clauses. Below, I have only
        mentioned those that present interesting implementation issues.

        The components identified as "mostly complete", below, have not been
        audited for conformance. In many cases where the library passes
        conformance tests we have non-conforming extensions that must be
        wrapped in #if guards for "pedantic" use, and in some cases renamed
        in a conforming way for continued use in the implementation regardless
        of conformance flags.

        The STL portion of the library still depends on a header
        stl/bits/stl_config.h full of #ifdef clauses. This apparatus
        should be replaced with autoconf/automake machinery.

        The SGI STL defines a type_traits<> template, specialized for
        many types in their code including the built-in numeric and
        pointer types and some library types, to direct optimizations of
        standard functions. The SGI compiler has been extended to generate
        specializations of this template automatically for user types,
        so that use of STL templates on user types can take advantage of
        these optimizations. Specializations for other, non-STL, types
        would make more optimizations possible, but extending the gcc
        compiler in the same way would be much better. Probably the next
        round of standardization will ratify this, but probably with
        changes, so it probably should be renamed to place it in the
        implementation namespace.

        The SGI STL also defines a large number of extensions visible in
        standard headers. (Other extensions that appear in separate headers
        have been sequestered in subdirectories ext/ and backward/.)  All
        these extensions should be moved to other headers where possible,
        and in any case wrapped in a namespace (not std!), and (where kept
        in a standard header) girded about with macro guards. Some cannot be
        moved out of standard headers because they are used to implement
        standard features.  The canonical method for accommodating these
        is to use a protected name, aliased in macro guards to a user-space
        name. Unfortunately C++ offers no satisfactory template typedef
        mechanism, so very ad-hoc and unsatisfactory aliasing must be used
        instead.

        Implementation of a template typedef mechanism should have the highest
        priority among possible extensions, on the same level as implementation
        of the template "export" feature.

        Chapter 18  Language support
        ----------------------------

        Headers: <limits> <new> <typeinfo> <exception>
        C headers: <cstddef> <climits> <cfloat>  <cstdarg> <csetjmp>
        <ctime>   <csignal> <cstdlib> (also 21, 25, 26)

        This defines the built-in exceptions, rtti, numeric_limits<>,
        operator new and delete. Much of this is provided by the
        compiler in its static runtime library.

        Work to do includes defining numeric_limits<> specializations in
        separate files for all target architectures. Values for integer types
        except for bool and wchar_t are readily obtained from the C header
        <limits.h>, but values for the remaining numeric types (bool, wchar_t,
        float, double, long double) must be entered manually. This is
        largely dog work except for those members whose values are not
        easily deduced from available documentation. Also, this involves
        some work in target configuration to identify the correct choice of
        file to build against and to install.

        The definitions of the various operators new and delete must be
        made thread-safe, which depends on a portable exclusion mechanism,
        discussed under chapter 20.  Of course there is always plenty of
        room for improvements to the speed of operators new and delete.

        <cstdarg>, in Glibc, defines some macros that gcc does not allow to
        be wrapped into an inline function. Probably this header will demand
        attention whenever a new target is chosen. The functions atexit(),
        exit(), and abort() in cstdlib have different semantics in C++, so
        must be re-implemented for C++.

        Chapter 19  Diagnostics
        -----------------------

        Headers: <stdexcept>
        C headers: <cassert> <cerrno>

        This defines the standard exception objects, which are "mostly complete".
        Cygnus has a version, and now SGI provides a slightly different one.
        It makes little difference which we use.

        The C global name "errno", which C allows to be a variable or a macro,
        is required in C++ to be a macro. For MT it must typically result in
        a function call.

        Chapter 20  Utilities
        ---------------------
        Headers: <utility> <functional> <memory>
        C header: <ctime> (also in 18)

        SGI STL provides "mostly complete" versions of all the components
        defined in this chapter. However, the auto_ptr<> implementation
        is known to be wrong. Furthermore, the standard definition of it
        is known to be unimplementable as written. A minor change to the
        standard would fix it, and auto_ptr<> should be adjusted to match.

        Multi-threading affects the allocator implementation, and there must
        be configuration/installation choices for different users' MT
        requirements. Anyway, users will want to tune allocator options
        to support different target conditions, MT or no.

        The primitives used for MT implementation should be exposed, as an
        extension, for users' own work. We need cross-CPU "mutex" support,
        multi-processor shared-memory atomic integer operations, and single-
        processor uninterruptible integer operations, and all three configurable
        to be stubbed out for non-MT use, or to use an appropriately-loaded
        dynamic library for the actual runtime environment, or statically
        compiled in for cases where the target architecture is known.

        Chapter 21  String
        ------------------
        Headers: <string>
        C headers: <cctype> <cwctype> <cstring> <cwchar> (also in 27)
        <cstdlib> (also in 18, 25, 26)

        We have "mostly-complete" char_traits<> implementations. Many of the
        char_traits<char> operations might be optimized further using existing
        proprietary language extensions.

        We have a "mostly-complete" basic_string<> implementation. The work
        to manually instantiate char and wchar_t specializations in object
        files to improve link-time behavior is extremely unsatisfactory,
        literally tripling library-build time with no commensurate improvement
        in static program link sizes. It must be redone. (Similar work is
        needed for some components in clauses 22 and 27.)

        Other work needed for strings is MT-safety, as discussed under the
        chapter 20 heading.

        The standard C type mbstate_t from <cwchar> and used in char_traits<>
        must be different in C++ than in C, because in C++ the default constructor
        value mbstate_t() must be the "base" or "ground" sequence state.
        (According to the likely resolution of a recently raised Core issue,
        this may become unnecessary. However, there are other reasons to
        use a state type not as limited as whatever the C library provides.)
        If we might want to provide conversions from (e.g.) internally-
        represented EUC-wide to externally-represented Unicode, or vice-
        versa, the mbstate_t we choose will need to be more accommodating
        than what might be provided by an underlying C library.

        There remain some basic_string template-member functions which do
        not overload properly with their non-template brethren. The infamous
        hack akin to what was done in vector<> is needed, to conform to
        23.1.1 para 10. The CHECKLIST items for basic_string marked 'X',
        or incomplete, are so marked for this reason.

        Replacing the string iterators, which currently are simple character
        pointers, with class objects would greatly increase the safety of the
        client interface, and also permit a "debug" mode in which range,
        ownership, and validity are rigorously checked. The current use of
        raw pointers as string iterators is evil. vector<> iterators need the
        same treatment. Note that the current implementation freely mixes
        pointers and iterators, and that must be fixed before safer iterators
        can be introduced.

        Some of the functions in <cstring> are different from the C version.
        generally overloaded on const and non-const argument pointers. For
        example, in <cstring> strchr is overloaded. The functions isupper
        etc. in <cctype> typically implemented as macros in C are functions
        in C++, because they are overloaded with others of the same name
        defined in <locale>.

        Many of the functions required in <cwctype> and <cwchar> cannot be
        implemented using underlying C facilities on intended targets because
        such facilities only partly exist.

        Chapter 22  Locale
        ------------------
        Headers: <locale>
        C headers: <clocale>

        We have a "mostly complete" class locale, with the exception of
        code for constructing, and handling the names of, named locales.
        The ways that locales are named (particularly when categories
        (e.g. LC_TIME, LC_COLLATE) are different) varies among all target
        environments. This code must be written in various versions and
        chosen by configuration parameters.

        Members of many of the facets defined in <locale> are stubs. Generally,
        there are two sets of facets: the base class facets (which are supposed
        to implement the "C" locale) and the "byname" facets, which are supposed
        to read files to determine their behavior. The base ctype<>, collate<>,
        and numpunct<> facets are "mostly complete", except that the table of
        bitmask values used for "is" operations, and corresponding mask values,
        are still defined in libio and just included/linked. (We will need to
        implement these tables independently, soon, but should take advantage
        of libio where possible.)  The num_put<>::put members for integer types
        are "mostly complete".

        A complete list of what has and has not been implemented may be
        found in CHECKLIST. However, note that the current definition of
        codecvt<wchar_t,char,mbstate_t> is wrong. It should simply write
        out the raw bytes representing the wide characters, rather than
        trying to convert each to a corresponding single "char" value.

        Some of the facets are more important than others. Specifically,
        the members of ctype<>, numpunct<>, num_put<>, and num_get<> facets
        are used by other library facilities defined in <string>, <istream>,
        and <ostream>, and the codecvt<> facet is used by basic_filebuf<>
        in <fstream>, so a conforming iostream implementation depends on
        these.

        The "long long" type eventually must be supported, but code mentioning
        it should be wrapped in #if guards to allow pedantic-mode compiling.

        Performance of num_put<> and num_get<> depend critically on
        caching computed values in ios_base objects, and on extensions
        to the interface with streambufs.

        Specifically: retrieving a copy of the locale object, extracting
        the needed facets, and gathering data from them, for each call to
        (e.g.) operator<< would be prohibitively slow.  To cache format
        data for use by num_put<> and num_get<> we have a _Format_cache<>
        object stored in the ios_base::pword() array. This is constructed
        and initialized lazily, and is organized purely for utility. It
        is discarded when a new locale with different facets is imbued.

        Using only the public interfaces of the iterator arguments to the
        facet functions would limit performance by forbidding "vector-style"
        character operations. The streambuf iterator optimizations are
        described under chapter 24, but facets can also bypass the streambuf
        iterators via explicit specializations and operate directly on the
        streambufs, and use extended interfaces to get direct access to the
        streambuf internal buffer arrays. These extensions are mentioned
        under chapter 27. These optimizations are particularly important
        for input parsing.

        Unused virtual members of locale facets can be omitted, as mentioned
        above, by a smart linker.

        Chapter 23  Containers
        ----------------------
        Headers: <deque> <list> <queue> <stack> <vector> <map> <set> <bitset>

        All the components in chapter 23 are implemented in the SGI STL.
        They are "mostly complete"; they include a large number of
        nonconforming extensions which must be wrapped. Some of these
        are used internally and must be renamed or duplicated.

        The SGI components are optimized for large-memory environments. For
        embedded targets, different criteria might be more appropriate. Users
        will want to be able to tune this behavior. We should provide
        ways for users to compile the library with different memory usage
        characteristics.

        A lot more work is needed on factoring out common code from different
        specializations to reduce code size here and in chapter 25. The
        easiest fix for this would be a compiler/ABI improvement that allows
        the compiler to recognize when a specialization depends only on the
        size (or other gross quality) of a template argument, and allow the
        linker to share the code with similar specializations. In its
        absence, many of the algorithms and containers can be partial-
        specialized, at least for the case of pointers, but this only solves
        a small part of the problem. Use of a type_traits-style template
        allows a few more optimization opportunities, more if the compiler
        can generate the specializations automatically.

        As an optimization, containers can specialize on the default allocator
        and bypass it, or take advantage of details of its implementation
        after it has been improved upon.

        Replacing the vector iterators, which currently are simple element
        pointers, with class objects would greatly increase the safety of the
        client interface, and also permit a "debug" mode in which range,
        ownership, and validity are rigorously checked. The current use of
        pointers for iterators is evil.

        As mentioned for chapter 24, the deque iterator is a good example of
        an opportunity to implement a "staged" iterator that would benefit
        from specializations of some algorithms.

        Chapter 24  Iterators
        ---------------------
        Headers: <iterator>

        Standard iterators are "mostly complete", with the exception of
        the stream iterators, which are not yet templatized on the
        stream type. Also, the base class template iterator<> appears
        to be wrong, so everything derived from it must also be wrong,
        currently.

        The streambuf iterators (currently located in stl/bits/std_iterator.h,
        but should be under bits/) can be rewritten to take advantage of
        friendship with the streambuf implementation.

        Matt Austern has identified opportunities where certain iterator
        types, particularly including streambuf iterators and deque
        iterators, have a "two-stage" quality, such that an intermediate
        limit can be checked much more quickly than the true limit on
        range operations. If identified with a member of iterator_traits,
        algorithms may be specialized for this case. Of course the
        iterators that have this quality can be identified by specializing
        a traits class.

        Many of the algorithms must be specialized for the streambuf
        iterators, to take advantage of block-mode operations, in order
        to allow iostream/locale operations' performance not to suffer.
        It may be that they could be treated as staged iterators and
        take advantage of those optimizations.

        Chapter 25  Algorithms
        ----------------------
        Headers: <algorithm>
        C headers: <cstdlib> (also in 18, 21, 26))

        The algorithms are "mostly complete". As mentioned above, they
        are optimized for speed at the expense of code and data size.

        Specializations of many of the algorithms for non-STL types would
        give performance improvements, but we must use great care not to
        interfere with fragile template overloading semantics for the
        standard interfaces. Conventionally the standard function template
        interface is an inline which delegates to a non-standard function
        which is then overloaded (this is already done in many places in
        the library). Particularly appealing opportunities for the sake of
        iostream performance are for copy and find applied to streambuf
        iterators or (as noted elsewhere) for staged iterators, of which
        the streambuf iterators are a good example.

        The bsearch and qsort functions cannot be overloaded properly as
        required by the standard because gcc does not yet allow overloading
        on the extern-"C"-ness of a function pointer.

        Chapter 26  Numerics
        --------------------
        Headers: <complex> <valarray> <numeric>
        C headers: <cmath>, <cstdlib> (also 18, 21, 25)

        Numeric components: Gabriel dos Reis's valarray, Drepper's complex,
        and the few algorithms from the STL are "mostly done".  Of course
        optimization opportunities abound for the numerically literate. It
        is not clear whether the valarray implementation really conforms
        fully, in the assumptions it makes about aliasing (and lack thereof)
        in its arguments.

        The C div() and ldiv() functions are interesting, because they are the
        only case where a C library function returns a class object by value.
        Since the C++ type div_t must be different from the underlying C type
        (which is in the wrong namespace) the underlying functions div() and
        ldiv() cannot be re-used efficiently. Fortunately they are trivial to
        re-implement.

        Chapter 27  Iostreams
        ---------------------
        Headers: <iosfwd> <streambuf> <ios> <ostream> <istream> <iostream>
        <iomanip> <sstream> <fstream>
        C headers: <cstdio> <cwchar> (also in 21)

        Iostream is currently in a very incomplete state. <iosfwd>, <iomanip>,
        ios_base, and basic_ios<> are "mostly complete". basic_streambuf<> and
        basic_ostream<> are well along, but basic_istream<> has had little work
        done. The standard stream objects, <sstream> and <fstream> have been
        started; basic_filebuf<> "write" functions have been implemented just
        enough to do "hello, world".

        Most of the istream and ostream operators << and >> (with the exception
        of the op<<(integer) ones) have not been changed to use locale primitives,
        sentry objects, or char_traits members.

        All these templates should be manually instantiated for char and
        wchar_t in a way that links only used members into user programs.

        Streambuf is fertile ground for optimization extensions. An extended
        interface giving iterator access to its internal buffer would be very
        useful for other library components.

        Iostream operations (primarily operators << and >>) can take advantage
        of the case where user code has not specified a locale, and bypass locale
        operations entirely. The current implementation of op<</num_put<>::put,
        for the integer types, demonstrates how they can cache encoding details
        from the locale on each operation. There is lots more room for
        optimization in this area.

        The definition of the relationship between the standard streams
        cout et al. and stdout et al. requires something like a "stdiobuf".
        The SGI solution of using double-indirection to actually use a
        stdio FILE object for buffering is unsatisfactory, because it
        interferes with peephole loop optimizations.

        The <sstream> header work has begun. stringbuf can benefit from
        friendship with basic_string<> and basic_string<>::_Rep to use
        those objects directly as buffers, and avoid allocating and making
        copies.

        The basic_filebuf<> template is a complex beast. It is specified to
        use the locale facet codecvt<> to translate characters between native
        files and the locale character encoding. In general this involves
        two buffers, one of "char" representing the file and another of
        "char_type", for the stream, with codecvt<> translating. The process
        is complicated by the variable-length nature of the translation, and
        the need to seek to corresponding places in the two representations.
        For the case of basic_filebuf<char>, when no translation is needed,
        a single buffer suffices. A specialized filebuf can be used to reduce
        code space overhead when no locale has been imbued. Matt Austern's
        work at SGI will be useful, perhaps directly as a source of code, or
        at least as an example to draw on.

        Filebuf, almost uniquely (cf. operator new), depends heavily on
        underlying environmental facilities. In current releases iostream
        depends fairly heavily on libio constant definitions, but it should
        be made independent.  It also depends on operating system primitives
        for file operations. There is immense room for optimizations using
        (e.g.) mmap for reading. The shadow/ directory wraps, besides the
        standard C headers, the libio.h and unistd.h headers, for use mainly
        by filebuf. These wrappings have not been completed, though there
        is scaffolding in place.

        The encapsulation of certain C header <cstdio> names presents an
        interesting problem. It is possible to define an inline std::fprintf()
        implemented in terms of the 'extern "C"' vfprintf(), but there is no
        standard vfscanf() to use to implement std::fscanf(). It appears that
        vfscanf but be re-implemented in C++ for targets where no vfscanf
        extension has been defined. This is interesting in that it seems
        to be the only significant case in the C library where this kind of
        rewriting is necessary. (Of course Glibc provides the vfscanf()
        extension.)  (The functions related to exit() must be rewritten
        for other reasons.)

        Annex D
        -------
        Headers: <strstream>

        Annex D defines many non-library features, and many minor
        modifications to various headers, and a complete header.
        It is "mostly done", except that the libstdc++-2 <strstream>
        header has not been adopted into the library, or checked to
        verify that it matches the draft in those details that were
        clarified by the committee. Certainly it must at least be
        moved into the std namespace.

        We still need to wrap all the deprecated features in #if guards
        so that pedantic compile modes can detect their use.

        Nonstandard Extensions
        ----------------------
        Headers: <iostream.h> <strstream.h> <hash> <rbtree>
        <pthread_alloc> <stdiobuf> (etc.)

        User code has come to depend on a variety of nonstandard components
        that we must not omit. Much of this code can be adopted from
        libstdc++-v2 or from the SGI STL. This particularly includes
        <iostream.h>, <strstream.h>, and various SGI extensions such
        as <hash_map.h>. Many of these are already placed in the
        subdirectories ext/ and backward/. (Note that it is better to
        include them via "<backward/hash_map.h>" or "<ext/hash_map>" than
        to search the subdirectory itself via a "-I" directive.